Archive
Random Thoughts: Volume I
After watching games 2 & 3 in the Western Conference Semi-Final between the Vancouver Canucks and the Chicago Blackhawks, and virtually all of the series they played last year, I’m left to wonder:
1) Why is the ice in front of the Canucks net painted blue? Isn’t that kind of a waste of blue paint?
2) If pushing the goalie out of the way and tucking the puck into the empty net, or simply ramming the goalie and the puck into the back of the net are supposedly acceptable and legal ways of scoring goals…why doesn’t Dustin Byfuglien get 60 goals every year?
3) If every team employed this way of producing offense, and the league allowed EVERY team to do it we would probably have 30 or 40 goals every game and 60 or 70 goalies on the Injured Reserve List by the end of the season.
The Montreal Canadiens’ effort level is at least double that of any other team’s in these playoffs.
PK Subban is gonna be some kinda special player
Steve Nash is a beast…he is literally WILLING his team to victory…they are now calling him “Cyclops” for his one-eyed effort in eliminating the Spurs in game4…a team they have lost in the playoffs to 4 times since 2003…this might be his last chance at a championship and I wouldn’t bet against him–even against Kobe Bryant and the Lakers (as long as the refs stay out of the way…and thats a BIG IF)
Sami Salo has a reputation for getting injured easily…after taking a shot to the “nether regions” and reportedly having a ruptured testicle, I’m gonna give him a pass on that one as I would probably miss 8-10 weeks minimum if it happened to me…
The Boston Bruins were up 3 games to 0 over the Philadelphia Flyers now its 3-2 with Game6 coming up in Philadelphia…wow…if Boston can’t close it out in Philly, I don’t like their chances in Game7. This could be historic.
The Sharks did get a LOT of help from the refs in the first 3 games against Detroit in my opinion, but they did deserve to win the series. However, for the record Game 1: 2 VERY questionable calls in the 3rd period leading to a 2-man advantage that produced the game winner Game 2: 2 somewhat questionable calls in the 3rd period leading to a 2-man advantage that produced the game tying goal. Game 3: A crucial goal by Henrik Zetterberg called back on yet another baffling video review
Of course these are all coincidences and refs are human and make mistakes….but if I’m a Red Wings fan I’m thinking “couldn’t at least one of those mistakes be in our favour?” Just saying…
After seeing the Zetterberg goal called back and the Daniel Sedin goal called back in the first round for much the same reason…I’m beginning to think someone at the NHL’s head office needs to buy a dictionary and look up the words “distinct” and “kick”…aw, hell…why don’t I help them out here:
distinct: clear to the senses or intellect; plain; unmistakable
kick: to make a rapid, forceful thrust with the foot or feet
Watch the video(s), read the definitions…nuff said.
Nobody knows what the NHL’s rules are from game to game. They seem to change by the minute. The NHL and its officials have been badly exposed, in my opinion, as inconsistent and directionless. In one game, a player can skate by a goalie and slightly touch him and have a goal disallowed as we saw in Game7 of the Montreal v Washington series and in another game the goalie can be sat on, cross-checked, pushed into the back of the net and slashed resulting in multiple goals without even a second glance. The fact of the matter is…NOBODY knows what the rules are anymore. Since the “new NHL rules” came out EVERYTHING can be considered a penalty, but the refs don’t HAVE to call it…what? couldn’t that lead to a lot of confusion and inconsistency? Well, it is Bettman’s NHL, so…
You can follow Sporting Vancouver on Twitter
Canucks v Blackhawks II
Drunk Kane
Well its gonna happen. The much awaited playoff rematch between the Vancouver Canucks and the Chicago Blackhawks. Last year, also in the second round, the Chicago Blackhawks crashed their way to a 6 game series win over the Canucks. This, along with a number of personal battles between players on both teams should allow for one hell of a series.
The Canucks will tell you that they felt they should have won last year, that they feel they are the better team, and if they stay out of the box and learn from last year’s mistakes they should win the series rematch.
The Blackhawks will tell you that they can get into Luongo’s head, can tame the twins, and should have no problem skating circles around the Canucks defense.
Sporting Vancouver will tell you that if the referees do their job and call goaltender interference EVEN ONCE in this series, something that seemed to, inexplicably, perplex them in last year’s series, the Vancouver Canucks should have enough to exact revenge against their rivals. However, if the refs allow Byfuglien and the Hawks forwards to use Luongo as a bean-bag chair as they did with impunity last year then the Canucks, again, will be up against it. It seemed as though Chicago scored at least 90% of their goals with Luongo shoved into the back of his net with one or two Blachawk forwards dog-piled on top of him. Somehow, this drew no attention from the referees whatsoever. Alain Vigneualt and his team better hope things will be different this year.
So far, it looks as though the league is determined to allow the goalies a chance to remain on their feet and attempt to stop shots. We saw the Kings called for goaltender interference 3 times in the last series. We also saw a Washington Capitals goal disallowed in a close game 7 because one of the Caps players allegedly grazed Montreal goaltender Jiroslav Halak’s toe preventing him from making a save. Now, I’m positive Luongo won’t get anywhere near that kind of protection from the referees in this series…but if he gets at least some protection the Blackhawks will have to find a way to get shots past Luongo instead of just shooting the puck into the empty net after pushing him out of the way.
This series will be a long one. This series will be a tough one. It will be entertaining and will probably be the best of the 4 conference semi-finals. We will see plenty of Byfuglien v Luongo, and maybe some Alberts v Byfuglien or O’Brien v Byfuglien. We’ll definitely see some Kane v Kesler, and probably some Kane v Ladd. Of course Burrows v Kjalmarsson and Samuelsson v Niemi. I’m thinking there will be a pretty good tag-team match between the Sedins and Keith & Seabrook. Mitchell v Toews would have been nice but Mitchell is still out. Of course we will see Vigneault v Quenville II, which should be a good one…I just hope we don’t see Refs v Canucks II…cuz that would suck.
Yes, Canucks v Blackhawks II will be a toe-to-toe, knock him down, drag him out, grudge match between two of the best, most dynamic teams in the NHL. Round 1 goes Saturday in Chicago. DING-DING!
Round 2: Here we go again…
With the Montreal Canadiens Game7 victory, and improbable comeback from down 3 games to 1, against the Washington Capitals, the Eastern Conference playoff picture has been turned on its ear with the top 3 seeds being eliminated. The Western Conference, however, has played out more to form with no upsets–unless you consider the 5th place Detroit Red Wings, who made it to the finals the last 2 years and won it all 2 years ago, beating the upstart 4th place Phoenix Coyotes an upset.
As we set up for the 2nd round of the Stanley Cup Playoffs, it is important to point out a few things. For starters, both of last year’s finalists, the Detroit Red Wings and Pittsburgh Penguins, are still alive and should be considered favorites despite the fact they finished 4th and 5th in their respective conferences…at least until someone beats them, which I don’t see happening in this next round. I am pretty sure Joe Thornton and the San Jose Sharks will wake up and remember that they’re Joe Thornton and the San Jose Sharks and produce yet another epic playoff fail. In the East, giant killers Montreal face another giant, but this time the giant sees them coming and knows how to handle them.
In the other 2 series I expect to see a couple of serious battles. Boston Bruins v Philadelphia Flyers should be a physical battle with 2 of the biggest, meanest defensemen in the league in Chris Pronger and Zdeno Chara patrolling their respective zones. In the West we will see a grudge match that has been brewing since last year’s 6 game bloodbath that saw the Chicago Blackhawks dispatch the Vancouver Canucks in 6 games. Look for the Canucks to do a better job this year of protecting the area around Roberto Luongo and be much better able to match Chicago’s scoring, thus returning the favour and knock out the Blackhawks in 6 games. In the East, Marc Savard’s return to the Bruins should be enough to lead them to victory over the Flyers, but expect a long series in that one.
In about 2 weeks time we will be looking at an Eastern Conference Final between Marc Savard’s Boston Bruins and the Pittsburgh Penguins as well as a Western Conference battle between the Detroit Red Wings and the Vancouver Canucks.
You can follow Sporting Vancouver on Twitter
Winds of Change in the Air
Heading into Wednesday night’s Western Conference Game4 between the Canucks and Kings in Los Angeles, things were looking rather dire and foreboding for the road team. Fresh off a frustrating 5-3 loss on Monday in a game where it seemed even the NHL itself was against them, things looked even worse what with an injury to D-man Aaron Rome and with Dr.Evil himself Gary Bettman in attendance to put out any conspiracy theory fires before the game and to tell all who would listen that there are never any problems in the NHL…EVER…not steroids, uninterested markets, or fixed games…’no way, not here’ said the commish.
The Canucks headed into this game desperately needing a win and a penalty kill. They found both, but not before the LA Kings scared the bejesus out of them and their fans by scoring on their first 2 power plays. It really was more of the same for the first two periods as the Canucks looked the lesser team..unable to kill penalties or win battles for loose pucks at either end. The Canucks were not able to get their shots through the Kings checkers or complete passes with the Angelinos clogging all the passing lanes.
Then, something happened. Something…somehow..changed. One could almost feel the air become still..then start to change direction…a different feel. The Canucks were able to kill off not, one but TWO STRAIGHT LA power-plays! Suddenly, their legs felt lighter, they seemed to skate faster, suddenly getting to loose pucks ahead of the now hesitant Kings. In fact, other than the Kings tying goal in the third, I dare say the Canucks carried the play and owned just about every shift for the last 10 minutes of the game…something we haven’t seen since Game1. Yes, the Canucks were skating stronger, with more vigour, asserting themselves shift by shift, reminding themselves that they were the best third period team in the league with 11 third period comebacks. Yes, they suddenly seemed themselves. It was as though the fog that was covering them through games two and three and the first two periods of Game4 was lifting and they could complete more than one pass in a row, they could get a shot to the net, they could get to a rebound, they could cycle the puck in the offensive zone, they could make a few very key saves, and they could score three goals in the third.
It was certainly a big difference from what we had seen earlier. What a difference a period makes. Now, the Canucks seem to have gotten their game back, have tied the series, regained home-ice advantage, and now carry the momentum heading into the, now, best of 3 series starting Friday at GM Place in front of what should be a revitalized crowd.
It was beginning to look as though the Canucks were starting to slip into, perhaps, another playoff disappointment where they hadn’t shown their best. At least now, no matter what happens from here on out, the Canucks have had their say in this series, they didn’t go quietly, and they spoke with a voice so loud that not even Gary Bettman, Mike Murphy or the league itself could silence them.
NHL Playoffs: 1st Rd. Predictions
As we enter the 2009/2010 NHL Stanley Cup playoffs, Sporting Vancouver would like to go on the record with 1st round predictions.
Let’s start with the Western Conference:
1st seed San Jose Sharks vs 8th place Colorado Avalanche
Everyone, by now, knows all about the San Jose Sharks and they’re Jekyll and Hyde routine once the playoffs start. During the 82 game regular season, the team dominates. Joe Thornton is constantly at or near the top in league scoring, Evgeni Nabakov is a brick wall, and the tremendous depth on offense and defense overwhelms everyone in their path. Then the playoffs start. Nabokov turns into “NaboSIEVE”, Thornton runs and hides, the other 1st liners turn invisible, and the team doesn’t seem as tough as it did…the Sharks turn into the minnows.
This year they have added Dany Heatley to their front line, and look much better all around. They are facing an upstart Colorado Avalanche who have surprised many teams with their youthful exuberance, speed, and quickness. The Sharks will not be taken by surprise by this team. They know what they are getting into. They know the expectations on them to get to the Stanley Cup Finals. They know they should easily beat the Avalanche. That is why they will lose to the Avs whose young players just don’t know that they’re not supposed to win.
AVALANCHE in 7
2nd seed Chicago Blackhawks v 7th place Nashville Predators
The Chicago Blackhawks have gotten exponentially better each of the last 3 years. Their young stars have developed, and gained a large amount of playoff experience. This team appears poised to take the next step. They have stars up front, led by Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews and on defence with Duncan Keith. Their goal-tending remains a question and expect Nashville’s Renne to be the better goaltender in this series…but it just won’t be enough.
Blackhawks in 6
3rd seed Vancouver Canucks v 6th place Los Angeles Kings
The Los Angeles Kings are one of the big surprises in the NHL this season. Their great young players like Anze Kopitar and Dustin Brown are now solid veterans and the core of the team. Sprinkle in some veteran leadership with Ryan Smyth, and a superstar young defenceman in Drew Doughty and you have the stars aligning to create quite a team. They have enough depth up front, enough depth on defence, and good enough goal-tending in Jonathan Quick to give the Northwest Champion Vancouver Canucks all they can handle.
The Vancouver Canucks have been dealing with serious injury troubles all season with among the highest man-games lost total in the league. They have seen a revolving door on defense all year and continue to play without their top shutdown defenseman Willie Mitchell. Their remaining defense are all banged up with each of them having missed some time to injury this season. All-Star goaltender Roberto Luongo is having a below average season by his standards and looks to put it behind him with a clean slate in the playoffs. Up front the Vancouver Canucks are as good as anyone in the league. Look for Art Ross Trophy winner Henrik Sedin to combine with his brother Daniel to come up with at least one goal a game. Contributions from Alex Burrows, Ryan Kesler, Mikael Samuelsson, and Pavol Demitra are critical as, no doubt, the Kings will be focusing all of their defensive energy towards shutting down the twins. Penalty killing will be critical for the Canucks as they will, no doubt, find their way into the box quite often against this speedy LA team.
The Kings will be good, but look for Ryan Kesler to neutralize their top line. At the end of it, the Canucks offensive depth will be too much for the young Kings to handle.
Canucks in 5
4th place Phoenix Coyotes v 5th place Detroit Red Wings
This is the battle of the 2 teams that nobody wanted to meet. An upstart Phoenix Coyotes who no team has yet figured out, and a late surging and finally healthy Detroit Red Wings who have all the playoff experience in the world.
Right off the bat, you have to give the goal-tending edge to Ilya Bryzgalov and the Phoenix Coyotes. This will be key as if they are to have any chance in this series they will need to have the better goal-tending. How do you handicap the Wings’ chances? They are built for the playoffs. Pure and simple. They should beat everyone they meet. Problem is, they’re playing a very good, hard-working defensive team who, to put it bluntly, have basically been slapped together in the last number of months…even head coach Dave Tippet wasn’t hired until after training camp started. They have been winning games with defense, goal-tending, and elbow grease all season. Then they added some scoring punch at the trade deadline with Wojtek Wolski and Lee Stempniak. Now what?
This series will be very interesting. In the end, I expect that the Red Wings, having finally gotten rolling, will find a way to eliminate the Coyotes (unless Gary Bettman has decreed that his team has team must win to keep them in Phoenix).
Red Wings in 6
Eastern Conference
1st seed Washington Capitals v 8th place Montreal Canadiens
Not many are giving the Montreal Canadiens any chance of winning this season. After all the President’s Trophy winning Washington Capitals have run roughshod over the entire Eastern Conference for 82 games, even while missing Alex Ovechkin for 10 games where they still managed a 7-2-1 record. Montreal proponents point to the Capitals’ goal-tending as the chink in their collective armour. That’s like saying Scarlett Johansson’s feet aren’t that sexy. Its minor and insignificant and nobody cares. The Canadiens’ goal-tending with Halak playing at his best is, at best, only somewhat better than what Theodore can provide for the Caps. For Montreal to have a chance here, the difference in goal-tending will have to be huge and their power-play needs to go lights out. Yes, there is some doubt as to whether or not Capitals star centre Niklas Backstrom will be able to go to start this series but it won’t matter. The Capitals are too good to not win this one.
Capitals in 5
2nd seed New Jersey Devils v 7th place Philadelphia Flyers
The Flyers have given the Devils everything they can handle all season winning the season series with a 5-1-0 record. They Flyers physicality and offensive depth should be enough to make New Jersey coach Jacques Lemaire worried. The big difference here will be goaltending. The Flyers goal-tending has improved with Brian Boucher stepping it up this year but the Devils have Martin Brodeur who is still proving he can get the job done. The Devils difficulty traditionally has been goal scoring, though they feel they have addressed this with the addition of Ilya Kovalchuk. This series will be interesting and will likely go the distance which facours the more experienced Devils.
Devils in 7
3rd seed Buffalo Sabres v 6th place Boston Bruins
This series will have excellent goal-tending with American goalies Ryan Miller and Tim Thomas. You would have to give the edge to buffalo in net but Boston’s net-minder certainly can get it done as well. This one will come down to Buffalo’s speed and scoring against Boston’s physicality and defense. Home ice advantage could definitely prove to be important in this series as both coaches will look to get their match-ups with the last change. This one is tough to call. Will Bruins’ star forward Marc Savard return from concussion to help the team’s offense? Expect this one to go the distance…again, with the home team taking it.
Sabres in 7
4th place Pittsburgh Penguins v 5th place Ottawa Senators
Ottawa goes into this series hoping to pull out an upset against Sidney Crosby and the defending Stanley Cup Champions. They do so without one of their top scoring threats and prized off-season acquisition Alexei Kovalev. Pittsburgh appears to have the edge in every category; goal-tending, defense, and forwards. It would likely take a miracle for Ottawa to win this series. That being said they have some grit and drive up front with players like team captain Daniel Alfredsson. Unfortunately, this won’t be enough to counter Crosby, Malkin, and Staal.
Penguins in 5
Stripes Offside on This One
I have tried to stay out of this one. I didn’t plan to be writing a blog about this Burrows/Auger controversy but it just won’t go away.
For those who have been living in a cave here is a recap of what has been going on:
On January 11th at GMPlace, the Vancouver Canucks played host to their conference rival Nashville Predators with whom they are competing for a playoff spot in a vital “4-point game”. Prior to the game, video evidence shows Stephane Auger pulling Vancouver Canuck Alex Burrows aside for a 31-second conversation. Now, I have seen refs talk to players briefly during the play before a faceoff, after a penalty, or even after a disputed goal….I don’t ever recall seeing a ref talk to a player for such a long time before the game even starts.
The game would proceed with multiple penalty calls to both teams and play was quite even until late in the game. With the game tied 2-2 in the third period Alex Burrows is called for unsportsmanlike conduct (or diving) and assessed a 2-minute penalty by referee Stephan Auger on a play that looked like a legitimate trip. Then, with about 4 minutes left in the 3rd period of a tied game with the Canucks on a power play, Auger strikes again calling Burrows on an extremely dubious interference call…so dubious in fact, it is safe to say that only Stephan Auger thought it was a penalty…he probably should have called it 2 minutes for wearing 14 blue (Burrows’ number and jersey colour). Everyone in the building was dumb-founded. Watching on TV I was bewildered as to why Auger would call this penalty and was wondering how much he had bet on the Predators. Everyone seemed confused. Everyone except Burrows that is.
You see, Alex Burrows knew why Stephane Auger had singled him out with a penalty that wasn’t a penalty late in a tie game. He knew why Auger seemed out to get him because, before the game, Auger told him he was going to get him. You see, in a previous game Alex Burrows had embarrased Stephane Auger by embellishing a hit from behind resulting in a 5 minute major. So, Auger figured he would get back at Burrows by embarassing himself again and calling a penalty that wasn’t a penalty to try to screw Burrows… and his team…and the fans…and the, to that point, unquestionable integrity of the NHL’s officials…and, yes, the game of hockey itself.
This vindictive and disgusting debacle of a penalty call, coupled with a subsequent dubious penalty call against the Canucks, cost them at least 1 crucial point in the standings and up to a 4 point swing in the standings against a team they are jockeying with for a playoff spot. The Predators did score on the ensuing power play to take the lead with only a few minutes to play.
After the game, an irate Alex Burrows, who managed to wait til the game was almost over (3 seconds left) to voice his displeasure to Auger resulting in another misconduct penalty, could not restrain his disgust and, unprecedently, spoke to the media about the incident. He described how Auger had singled him out before the game and told him that he was going to get him, and how he did a wonderful job staying true to his word, punishing the Canucks late in the game. Auger allegedly even went as far as winking at Burrows after one of his phantom calls.
As Sporting Vancouver predicted on Twitter, Alex Burrows was fined by the league while referee Stephan Auger received no discipline. The league quickly buried the issue, down-playing the incident as well as they could. They claimed that they had investigated the incident and found no impropriety on Auger’s part…it sure didn’t take them long. Did they even bother investigating it? Do they not think this is important? If there is any question at all as to wether or not the league referee’s are calling a game based on anything other than the rules…if there is any doubt as to their motivation shouldn’t an extensive investigation take place? You would think so….but, you see, this is Bettman’s NHL. An NHL that never admits wrongdoing no matter how many non-traditional hockey market teams fail, no matter how many times they crap the bed on league discipline, and, now, no matter how many dirty refs there are in the league.
After seeing this head-in-the-sand routine by the NHL on this issue, it leaves your humble blogger to wonder “what would stop a referee from mortgaging his house, betting all the money on a game he is officiating, and making sure the team he betted on won the game”? Not the NHL. Not Gary Bettman. Not Colin Campbell. Apparently, they are positively sure that there was absolutely no chance of any impropriety by Stephane Auger after their extensive one (1) day investigation in which the only person interviewed on the matter was….Stephane Auger. Might as well write the referees a blank cheque…I think I might sign up for reffing in the NHL….I could make MILLIONS in hockey bets. Wait a minute….bet…Bettman….bet…Bettman…
Sporting Vancouver 